My Side of the Fence

The danger isn't going too far. It's that we don't go far enough.

Page 59 of 403

An Interesting Thought Experiment

I was sitting in church last week, well, maybe it was the week before, but I was sitting in church, listening to the priest deliver her sermon.  It was a reasonably good piece that had a great thought experiment buried in it that was nearly lost due to a ridiculous "texting in church" exercise.  The priest prattled on somewhat about why people don't come back to church and asked that we text her our thoughts and questions.  I'm far too pedantic to answer that question in a responsible way and I sent her the following text: "why r u asking people in church y people aren't here.  idk y u dont come bak go ask them!"  I really should have just left it alone.  I was in church for crying out loud.  I should have been more charitable.  In any event, I'm as close to losing the thread as she was on Sunday.

After announcing the text experiment she asked this "What do you think Jesus would say if he walked in that door right now"?  I like to fancy myself a thoughtful person and that question provoked a response somewhere down in me brains.  Something along the lines of "shit!  (whoops!)  that would be something else"  What would he say?  What would I say?  Then she asked "What would Jesus think of all of this?  What would he think about the condition of his church"?  What indeed.  I've been noodling on this ever since.

I'll never be accused of being a biblical scholar but I have read the bible and quite a number of books that study, at a reasonable level of detail, certain sections of the bible.  I've tried to understand it all.  There are two things that have always struck me about the bible.  The first is the (in my view) stark difference between God in the OT and God in the NT.  OT God seems more judgmental and willing to lay a smack-down on you.  NT God is heavily modified by Jesus' humanity and seems far more interested in forgiveness and your fellow man.  So, I wonder where God currently is on all of this.  The second is how human he was and where he was in the scheme of things when his ministry began in earnest.  Definitely an outside – in reformer.  You don't just show up at the temple and start knocking over tables unless you're making some sort of point….and a public one at that.  I've wondered what a modern Jesus would look like.  There's some folks down in Texas who think they know and it is, in some folks eyes, provocative.  I think it's strong.

I think the Jesus that walked through the door would be from the fringes of society.  Not a crazy or wild-eyed pistol waver but from the fringe.  He would be thoughtful and intelligent.  He might have some ink!  I know that he's omniscient and all but I think he would express some discomfort at how heavily the church is fractured.  He might have some rough things to say about the condition of the church.  The church does way more right than wrong these days but you are talking about the guy that started the business 2,000 years ago with 2 women and 12 guys fleeing prosecution.  The church *is* the establishment now.  That'll take some getting used to.  

The social questions that Jesus might speak to are both the most interesting and difficult to figure out in advance.  Humans have knotted themselves tightly over the past 2,000 years over these questions.  The OT God appears to have had some problems with homosexuality.  The NT God really doesn't seem to address it at all.  I think that the ink-stained, denim-jacket clad Jesus that walks into my church really isn't all that interested in crafting elaborate civil structures to avoid the question.  It's one of those "settle it in a sentence moments" like a "render unto Caesar" scenario.  I think it sounds like this…me: "Hey, Jesus, what about homosexuality"?  Jesus: "Are they your Brothers and Sisters"?  Or, I could be horribly wrong and he kills me with a lightning bolt.   Dunno and ain't likely to find out the easy way.

I can't draw this to a witty conclusion or answer any questions for you but I will say this:  I keep an eye on the door, just in case.

Election Results

This is a bit of an odd exercise but I'm writing this the day before the election and will publish it after the election so I don't have any idea what's going to happen but I do know this:  Bill Bolling would have won this thing in a walk.  He would have made Terry look a fool.  However, for the republican party in Virginia, politics seems to have become more about the journey than the destination.  It's a bit of a reflection of what we see happening in Washington.  Everyone wants to make a point.  The republicans seem to have believed that if they just nominated a "fearless conservative" or a "straight talker" that everyone would get the point.  Well, the phone rang and nobody answered as the polls have T-Mac slightly ahead or even.  Worse, all T-mac has to do is not be Cuccinelli.  Political movements, parties and factions all require 2 things in order to "make a point": electoral victories and legislative victories.  Republicans in Virginia appear close to having neither.

The theme for this election should have been easy.  Even though Governor Bob is now desperate to avoid indictment, he had the theme for his election spot on: "Bob's for Jobs" – kitchen table issues.  Sounds simplistic but when things are going to hell, Congress looks like two drunks in a mud-wrestling pit and nobody knows what is going to happen with health insurance this was easy.  Vaginal ultrasounds and abortion were only ever going to motivate 20% of the electorate.  The rest may or may not be pro life but in uncertain times, people seek leadership that speaks to their problems. 

This isn't a bolt from the blue but the fact is that Governors in VA get elected by being able to run towards the middle and appeal to that large swath of voters in the middle.  The argument that someone as conservative as Cuccinelli can't get elected is hogwash.  Our current Governor had to fight that "too conservative" label – anyone remember his thesis from Regents University?  Pretty outlandish.  Governor Bob is every bit as conservative as Cuccinelli but when he ran for Governor, he ran on kitchen table issues and left the social issues on the side.  Indeed, his election shows that even if people thought he was too conservative his priorities were those he shared with all of his fellow Virginians.  Mr. Cuccinelli can make no such argument.

In addition, T-Mac is an awful candidate.  Never held elected office, party hack, money man, questionable business activities and he just seems like a carpet bagger.  He would be trounced by a more moderate candidate but it's going to be close.  Either way, you know what they call the person that wins a gubernatorial election by 1 vote?  Governor.

« Older posts Newer posts »