That's the number one question I get from people after they watch a long public hearing or citizens time. "How do you sit up there and listen to that?" I reply, "well, it's my job". After an hour or so it isn't a lot of fun as my back starts to hurt but it is part and parcel of this job so I get up and stretch. That helps some but by the next day I am in a fair amount of pain.
Another question is "How do you listen to those people when they are obviously wrong/crazy/uniformed/whatever"? The answer is easy: almost everyone that speaks gets a least something or almost everything wrong. Nothing wrong with that. Their job is to tell me what they think. My job is to use the time I've spent on these subjects, the city's staff and my life experience to figure out what, if anything, to do about it. For instance, people at the recent public hearing regarding abortion clinics wondered why such a "common sense" approach to regulation wouldn't work? I can tell you in all honesty that, based on my experience with "Definition of a Family", the federal courts aren't much interested in common sense. The Federal system is an otherworld where common sense is not a primary concern where constitutional rights are at stake. No indeed, my job is to discern what an individual speaker is trying to convey. Some folks are passionate and tightly focused. Some are angry. Some wander all over the place. Some, well, you're not really sure what they're talking about but I need to figure out – at the most fundamental level – what they are trying to get accross. Most times you can sift something from the speakers words.
I will say that I have never understood why speakers feel compelled to threaten or insult the Mayor and Council members. Delegate Bob Marshall the other night told the Council "we will be responsible for the mayhem and unrest in the city" (or something close to that) if we didn't approve the "Aveni Amendment". What does that mean? Is he going to lead the unrest and mayhem? Another speaker indicated that the only reason the Council hadn't already approved the Aveni amendment was that we were being "paid by the abortion clinic". Money/corruption is always a fan favorite. It is with some regularity that we're accused of "lining our pockets", being ignorant, greedy, dumb, etc, etc. I think it's fine to disagree and be passionate about it but bribes from the abortion clinic? Really?
The one thing that I would change about citizens time: I would move non-resident speakers to the back of the line during citizens time. The taxpayers of Manassas should be first in line to address their leadership and not blocked behind people from all over. It is, after all, our money and our home town that is on the line.
