My Side of the Fence

The danger isn't going too far. It's that we don't go far enough.

Category: City Stuff (page 4 of 49)

I’m really just over it.

I was going to invest some quality time writing a witty and entertaining blog post but I really can't be bothered.  If the Mayans have it right, everything stops on Friday anyways so I'll not be investing any time screwing around with blog posts.  Indeed, my fondest hope this morning is to simply brain dump some budget jargon onto the screen so that I can finish my "Duck Dynasty" marathon before the world ends.  Hopefully I won't run out of TV dinners, coffee or wine before Friday 'cause I ain't leaving the house.  So, here goes:

I have had some ask me "Why is the city budget so complicated?  Are you guys hiding something?"  My replies: 1. having a simple budget for a large organization invites abuse.  The budget needn't be overly complicated but accounting for and managing the city's money is a big job and 2. no.  The lynchpin in understanding the City's budget is to understand the "Funds".  It's how the City segregates revenue streams and pays for stuff.  There are really 5-6 important funds and those funds all have (mostly) different funding sources.  However, all of the money that is spent in these funds is taxpayer money.  This isn't comprehensive but you'll get the idea:

The Big Kahuna is the "General Fund".  Roads, Cops, Schools, Staff, Public Works.  This is the fund that pays for most stuff in the city.  It has a number of income streams including Real Estate taxes, sales tax, car tax, bpol, m&t, etc.  Over half the money that comes into the General Fund is shared with the schools according to a funding agreement.  When people talk about cutting or raising taxes, this is the fund they're usually talking about.

Public Safety (Fire) Fund: Fire & Rescue and all associated infrastructure – buildings, repairs, trucks, staff, etc.  Funded by Real Estate taxes in the form of the fire levy and some grants.  This fund has grown the fastest of late but it needed to.  We can't be screwing around with 20 year old fire trucks.  They cost more to repair than replace and reliability is key.

Water: the water fund is paid for/funded through your water bill.  That $1.5 million dollar project we approved last night to begin replacing our water line from the lake will be paid for through your water bill.  

Sewer: same as water and is actually a line item on your water bill.  Look for this item to continue to escalate as the Chesapeake Bay cleanup continues to stumble along b/c gov't water and stormwater bureaucrats can't get it right.  I'm all for cleaning up the bay but sooner or later you have to look upstream.  It isn't magic….Sorry, I'm offtopic…

Electric: electric bill pays for this one.  Ongoing capital investment but mainly in maintenance and upgrades.

Airport: paid for by leasing lots out at the airport for private entities to build hangars and other facilities on.  Operated by and "Airport Board" but expenditures are approved by Council.  Receives no general fund revenue!  Gets a lot of money through federal and state grants for building projects.

Additionally, each of these funds has its own fund balance and CIP.  The current debate we're having about not funding the CIP is only for the General Fund.  The other funds are pretty immune to the political debate.  Much of their spending is driven by our wise overlords in Richmond in the form of unfunded mandates.  Although to be fair, the folks in Richmond are in many cases passing along requirements from those bozos in Washington.  

I do get questions from time to time about why each fund has its own savings account (fund balance).  It's a question I asked when I was first elected: aren't we needlessly tying up taxpayer money here?  The answer is not really.  The two biggest fund balances (pretty sure) are the general fund and the electric fund.  The General Fund is the city's savings account and needs to be large enough to deal with big problems: a $1million dollar snowstorm cleanup for instance.  The electric fund is a bit of an odd duck in that the cash operating requirements for that fund are huge – it pays for all of the electricity used in the city every month.  That requires a lot of cash – you might be late paying your bill but the city can't be.  It's mainly just passed through from ratepayers to Dominion but it's got to be paid.  The other funds should also normally accumulate some amount of fund balance as well.  If you have infrastructure, it needs to be maintained and/or replaced over time.

Hopefully this helps.  If we get through Friday, I promise to dedicate a bit more effort to another budget post – I'll spend some time on the revenue sharing agreement.  Ought to be interesting where that ends up…..

Schools 100-Day Report

One of my friends over on the PWC Board is traveling over in Germany.  I follow him on Facebook and, when he's traveling, he posts quite a bit.  Just any neat stuff.  He found a locality over there that's obviously trying to reinvent itself and they're using the slogan "Change doesn't start with a maybe".  My personal favorite slogan is "the danger isn't going too far, it's that we don't go far enough".  They're both good slogans that reflect a significant difference in approach.  Not that my favorite slogan is some sort of war-cry but the German version is a shade more genteel.  It's probably a bit more useful for larger institutions.

These slogans are an apt metaphor for how I feel about the Superintendents 100-Day report.  Overall it was a well-delivered report that was carefully crafted.  The Superintendent has been on the job a couple of months but clearly sees the challenges.  But I wanted more.  I didn't want more content, as I indicated above, the presentation was well crafted and delivered by a professional.  No, I wanted more passion.  I wanted an Aveni-esque (apologies Marc) convention stemwinder.  Banging on the table while delivering a steely-eyed indictment of the whole mess followed by a path forward.  A demand.  Passion.  A barely contained energy that imbues others with an unyielding sense of purpose.  Ptichforks.  Torches.  I didn't get it.

No sireee…I didn't get it….and that's probably ok.  In fact, upon reflection, it's probably best.  My admiration of a good stemwinder notwithstanding, the job our Super has is a delicate one.  People, including me, need to be thoughtful about this when they comment.  There are no apt metaphors to the private sector.  Even if the good Doctor is inclined to start knocking off heads, she can't.  School employees are all under contract and were the day she started so her choices are stark: raise the game of your existing employees or plunge the entire institution into chaos by proclaiming that everything sucks but it'll be fixed next June.  And by fixed I mean we'll set up a guillotine in the parking lot and take a somewhat more aggressive approach to the matter….

Despite our differences in approach I think she made the right choice.  My child is in the City schools so I've met many of the teachers in those schools.  Certainly we have had a couple of teachers we didn't appreciate.  That's inevitable in any institution of more than about 2 people but the overwhelming majority of the teachers that we have met are dedicated professionals that just want a chance to succeed.  They need leadership (bozos must be ruthlessly excised from leadership positions) that will get them over the hump and on towards a success that the entire institution can share in.  My child's teachers push her hard.  She has a fair amount of homework that does not consist of copied sheets with checkboxes on them.  I believe our teachers are capable  pro's and that the Superintendent is capable of raising their game while planning a way forward that might involve some pain. 

A criticism I've heard from others is that the Superintendent's presentation didn't inventory the problems she found.  My thought in watching it was that she didn't dodge the issue but neither was it an inventory of troubles.  I expect there are several reasons for this but here's the main one:  it serves little purpose in the larger mission.  Certainly she needs to understand the problems but dwelling on them in public doesn't do much other than satisfy those looking to find fault anyway.  Why feed it? 

It won't be easy and it won't be immediate but I think we are finally finding a direction we can support.  I know I do.

Copyright 2012 Andrew Harrover.  No part of this work may be reproduced in whole or part without written permission of the author.

Older posts Newer posts